Middle managers (MMs) are once again under scrutiny, bearing the brunt of layoffs as organizations label them as “bloat.” Recent reports show that MMs account for 30% of laid-off employees, sparking debates about whether such widespread reductions are a wise move.
While it’s true that some companies are overly burdened in the middle and need to streamline, and others face financial pressures necessitating payroll cuts, treating MMs as expendable risks significant long-term damage. Research consistently shows that effective middle managers are not just valuable—they are essential to organizational success.
Effective middle managers act as the bridge between executive vision and frontline execution. They transform strategic objectives into actionable plans, ensuring that goals are met and teams remain engaged.
Blanchard’s Leadership-Profit Chain, a comprehensive meta-analysis of hundreds of academic studies, underscores the critical role MMs play in driving organizational success. Key findings include:
Effective middle managers directly influence employee passion.
Passionate employees drive customer devotion.
Employee passion and satisfied customers fuel organizational vitality.
“While executives play a crucial role in shaping vision and strategy, they don’t directly drive day-to-day organizational success,” explains Dr. Jay Campbell, Blanchard’s Chief Product Officer. “Executives often lack the bandwidth—and sometimes the skills—to operationalize their plans. That’s where middle managers come in. Removing this vital link puts organizations at significant risk.”
The consequences of sidelining MMs are well-documented. Take Google’s 2002 experiment, for instance. In an effort to streamline operations, the tech giant eliminated MMs, assuming they were unnecessary bureaucrats. The result? Chaos. Within months, the organization reversed course, acknowledging that MMs were indispensable.
What Makes a Great Middle Manager? Lessons from Project Oxygen
After the failed experiment, Google set out to understand what qualities define an exceptional MM. This led to Project Oxygen, a years-long research initiative aimed at identifying the traits and behaviors of effective middle managers.
The findings were transformative. Stellar MMs shared key characteristics:
They were skilled coaches.
They avoided micromanagement.
They genuinely cared about their team members.
They held regular one-on-one meetings.
They connected employees’ work to the organization’s broader mission.
They provided timely, constructive feedback.
Equipped with these insights, Google implemented measures to improve MM performance. Leaders were rated by their teams on the eight attributes identified by Project Oxygen, and those needing improvement had access to targeted training. The results were remarkable, with employee satisfaction and ratings of managers significantly increasing.
The ongoing trend of targeting middle managers as a cost-cutting measure raises concerns about organizational shortsightedness. The Leadership-Profit Chain and Project Oxygen offer hard evidence of the pivotal role MMs play in maintaining employee engagement, customer satisfaction, and overall organizational health.
Dr. Campbell emphasizes caution: “Restructuring is sometimes necessary, but indiscriminately cutting middle managers can undermine critical business operations and initiatives. Before targeting MMs, organizations must ensure they are genuinely overstaffed in that layer.”
A smarter approach is investing in the development of middle managers. By equipping them with the right skills—such as coaching, communication, and team leadership—companies can strengthen their organizations rather than weaken them.
While organizations facing financial or structural challenges may need to trim the fat, cutting middle managers en masse is rarely the right answer. Instead, leaders should learn from the hard-won lessons of the past.
Middle managers are not simply “bloat” to be discarded. They are the heart of the house, translating strategy into action and keeping the workforce engaged and productive. Supporting and developing these leaders is not only a strategic move but also a vital investment in the future success of the organization.
Before making cuts, organizations must ask themselves: Are we targeting inefficiencies—or dismantling our foundation?
Best Reagrds,
Yogesh